Findings from two online experiments to advance the science on sexual orientation and gender identity measurement: An application to estimating cigarette relighting behaviors.
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
To better understand the impact of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) measurement choices on estimates of hazardous health behaviors, we examined the impact of SOGI measurement choices on estimates of relighting, as an example hazardous health behavior. We embedded a 2×2×2 factorial experiment within a convenience sample of US adults ages 18-45 who smoke daily or some days (N=271) and a nationally representative sample of US adults ages 21+ who smoke regularly (20+ days per month and in past week; N=2020) to test three aspects of SOGI measurement: order of gender identity questions, wording of the heterosexual response option when assessing sexual orientation, and order of sexual orientation identity response options. We compared relighting prevalence among individuals classified as being a sexual or gender minority (SGM) across survey conditions. There were large statistically significant differences in relighting behavior by condition, but only in the convenience sample: prevalence was higher if gender identity was assessed by asking gender before sex (95.0% vs 66.7%, p=.029) and if ordering the sexual orientation response options by population prevalence (95.0% vs 66.7%, p=.029). SOGI measurement choices may impact estimates of cigarette relighting, but larger studies are needed to further evaluate this phenomenon.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Findings from two online experiments to advance the science on sexual orientation and gender identity measurement: An application to estimating cigarette relighting behaviors.
- Date Crossref
- 03/09/2026
- Éditeur
- American Psychological Association (APA)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.