Case Report: Isolated splenic hydatid cyst with negative serology managed by laparoscopic splenectomy
Résumé fourni par la source
Background Hydatid disease caused by Echinococcus granulosus is a zoonosis endemic in many parts of the world. While hepatic and pulmonary involvements are common, isolated splenic hydatidosis remains extremely rare, representing less than 4% of all cases. Diagnosis can be further complicated by false-negative serological tests. Case presentation We report the case of a 31-year-old female presenting with isolated left upper quadrant pain. Physical examination and baseline laboratory tests were unremarkable. Abdominal ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) revealed a well-circumscribed, homogeneous, hypodense oval mass (50×57×56 mm) at the upper pole of the spleen with a thin wall displaying a focal calcification. Hydatid serology was negative. Given the high suspicion of a hydatid cyst, pre-splenectomy immunizations were administered, and the patient underwent an exploratory laparoscopy. Intraoperative findings confirmed a splenic hydatid cyst, and a total laparoscopic splenectomy was performed. The postoperative course was uneventful. Histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis. Conclusion Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for hydatid disease in patients presenting with cystic splenic masses in endemic areas, even in the presence of negative serology. Laparoscopic splenectomy is a safe and effective approach when strict hydatid safety measures are respected.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Case Report: Isolated splenic hydatid cyst with negative serology managed by laparoscopic splenectomy
- Date Crossref
- 03/09/2026
- Éditeur
- Frontiers Media SA
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.