Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Medical therapy of MASLD – consequences of the paradigm shift from histology to non-invasive tests

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
53Institutions déclarées
13Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : de, jp, gb, in, fr, ch, my, us, br, kr, cn, hk, it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The recent approval of pharmacological therapies for fibrotic metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) has increased the need for accurate identification of treatment-eligible patients. Current recommendations increasingly rely on non-invasive tests (NITs), including vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE), while multiparametric ultrasound (MPUS) may provide additional opportunities for non-invasive assessment. However, agreement between histology and imaging-based approaches remains uncertain. We compared treatment eligibility based on histology, VCTE, and MPUS in two international biopsy-proven cohorts of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). METHODS: We analysed two biopsy-proven MASLD cohorts: CAP-IPDMA (n=1029), including VCTE and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP), and iLEAD (n=124), including MPUS. Treatment eligibility was assessed using histologically confirmed F2/F3 MASH and NIT-based recommendations from international expert panels. RESULTS: In CAP-IPDMA, 277/1029 patients (26.9%) met the histological definition of "at-risk MASH". Depending on the VCTE cut-off, 13.2-32.0% qualified for treatment. Overlap between histological "at-risk MASH" and VCTE thresholds was limited, reaching 27.8% when using VCTE 8-15 kPa, and decreasing when narrower or higher thresholds were applied. Among patients identified only by VCTE 8-15 kPa, males had lower median AST and ALT than those fulfilling only the histological indication (35 vs 48 IU/L p=0.034 and 45 vs 62 IU/L p=0.0072, respectively). In iLEAD, 21/124 patients (16.9%) met the histological definition, while 13.7-16.1% were eligible based on SWE thresholds, again with a similarly limited overlap. CONCLUSIONS: Histology and non-invasive tests capture partly distinct patient populations, meaning that both the number and type of patients selected for therapy depend on the chosen modality and cutoffs. As vibration-controlled transient elastography and multiparametric ultrasound become increasingly accessible in clinical practice, prospective validation is essential for establishing reliable non-invasive treatment pathways. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: The current literature reflects a paradigm shift away from biopsy-based approaches toward NIT-based assessment of treatment eligibility in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), which may substantially affect which patients receive newly approved therapies. Our results are important for clinicians, researchers, and guideline developers because histology and current NIT cut-offs identify only partially overlapping patient populations, implying that different diagnostic strategies select different risk profiles. In practice, these findings support thoughtful implementation of NIT-based treatment pathways, the use of repeated measurements, and prospective validation of NIT thresholds to guide clinical care, trial design, and health policy decisions.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Medical therapy of MASLD – consequences of the paradigm shift from histology to non-invasive tests
Date Crossref
01/09/2026
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

University Hospital LeipzigLeipzig UniversityLeipzig University of Applied SciencesDokkyo Medical UniversitySaitama Medical UniversityFoundation for Liver ResearchTokyo Medical UniversityAll India Institute of Medical SciencesInsermUniversité Paris CitéHôpital BeaujonAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de ParisCentre de Recherche sur l'InflammationUniversité Paris-SudUniversité Paris-SaclayHôpitaux Universitaires Paris-OuestHôpital Antoine-BéclèreUniversité de BordeauxBordeaux Population HealthUniversitätsklinikum ErlangenUniversity of LucerneUniversity of MalayaKeck Hospital of USCNorthwestern UniversityNorthwestern Memorial HospitalUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroHospital Universitário Clementino Fraga FilhoChung-Ang University HospitalNIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research CentreHyogo Medical UniversityNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchThe Royal Free HospitalUniversity College LondonUniversity of WashingtonNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustNIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research CentreRocky Vista UniversityUniversity of PlymouthSeoul National University HospitalJohn Radcliffe HospitalSecond Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang UniversityKantonsspital St. GallenChinese University of Hong KongSun Yat-sen UniversityThird Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen UniversityImperial College Healthcare NHS TrustCharing Cross HospitalThe First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityNortheast Ohio Medical UniversityPoliclinico Umberto IUniversity of PaviaJuntendo UniversityKurume University

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Gastroesophageal reflux and treatmentsCongenital Ear and Nasal AnomaliesGastrointestinal motility and disorders

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.