Titre indisponible

Résumé fourni par la source

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can generate fluent visual responses even when the underlying visual prediction is weak, ambiguous, or incorrect. This work presents a retrieval-augmented, reliability-aware selective inference method that evaluates the strength and consistency of visual evidence before a prediction is communicated through a downstream multimodal response. A pretrained ResNet-50 encoder extracts normalized visual embeddings, and FAISS retrieves the top𝑘 reference images from an ImageNet-100 evidence database. Prediction reliability is assessed using retrieval similarity, class-support agreement, evidence margin, entropy-based uncertainty, and an aggregate reliability score. A decision gate then determines whether the prediction should be accepted, presented cautiously, or rejected through abstention or fallback. The selected decision is used to control the final user-facing response generated by the model. Experiments on ImageNet-100 show that the proposed method improves the accuracy of returned predictions from 85.84% to 88.88% at 89.04% coverage. The accepted error rate decreases from 14.16% to 11.12%, corresponding to a 3.04-percentage-point absolute reduction and a 21.48% relative reduction. Expected Calibration Error decreases from 7.40% to 5.87%, while high-reliability wrong predictions decrease from 263 to 226. These results demonstrate the potential of retrieval-derived evidence and selective decision gating as a post-hoc reliability mechanism for controlling visual predictions before they are incorporated into multimodal responses. The current evaluation is conducted in a controlled visual-classification setting and does not constitute a complete assessment of free-form MLLM hallucination.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.