Rebuttal to Correspondence on “PFAS Toxicity: What’s True, What’s Not, and What Really Matters”

Résumé fourni par la source

We trust that the intended meaning is clear within the context of the reported hazard ratios.Kleinschmidt et al. 1 ended their Correspondence by flagging an Opinion by Paustenbach et al. 6 that we did not cite in our article.To provide readers with comprehensive evaluations of PFAS health effects, we refer to the systematic reviews conducted by organizations such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, [7][8][9] the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 10 the International Agency for Research on Cancer, 11 the U.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.