Advanced ALK–EML4 fusion–positive non-small cell lung cancer with intraspinal metastases: a case report
Résumé fourni par la source
Among non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive disease is characterized by a chromosomal rearrangement that generates an oncogenic ALK fusion gene, occurring in approximately 2–11% of patients. ALK-positive NSCLC is associated with a high incidence of brain metastases, with at least 20% of patients presenting with brain metastases at the time of diagnosis. Conversely, intraspinal metastasis is an uncommon site of metastatic involvement in patients with NSCLC. When intraspinal metastases invade the lumbar spinal canal, they may cause low back pain as well as neurological symptoms and signs in the lower limbs. Herein, we report a case of intraspinal metastasis in a patient with ALK–EML4 fusion–positive lung adenocarcinoma. Notably, at the time of initial relapse, molecular profiling failed to detect any mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or ALK genes. However, next-generation sequencing performed at the third recurrence confirmed the presence of the ALK–EML4 fusion mutation. Following the fifth disease recurrence, the patient received palliative radiotherapy followed by combination targeted therapy with lorlatinib and anlotinib, and subsequently transitioned to maintenance therapy with lorlatinib, achieving an overall survival of 121 months (right-censored, t+) and a duration of treatment of 48 months (t+) with lorlatinib as fifth-line therapy.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Advanced ALK–EML4 fusion–positive non-small cell lung cancer with intraspinal metastases: a case report
- Date Crossref
- 03/09/2026
- Éditeur
- Frontiers Media SA
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.