Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Early Versus Late Biliary Leakage After Hepatic Resection: Incidence, Risk Profiles, and Clinical Impact of Diagnostic Timing

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Background/Objectives: Post-hepatectomy biliary leakage (BL) remains a major source of postoperative morbidity. While traditional risk models treat BL as a single clinical entity, its chronological presentation follows distinct patterns that raise the hypothesis of distinct underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. This study aimed to stratify post-hepatectomy biliary fistulas into early and late onset to identify unique independent risk factors and clarify their separate risk profiles. Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated 370 patients who underwent hepatic resection between 2020 and 2024. BL was defined according to the International Study Group of Liver Surgery criteria. Based on the bimodal distribution of diagnostic timing within the cohort, patients were stratified by the postoperative day (POD) of diagnosis into Early Biliary Leakage (EBL, diagnosed on POD ≤ 7) and Late Biliary Leakage (LBL, diagnosed on POD > 7). Independent predictors were identified using binary and multinomial logistic regression models. Results: The overall incidence of BL was 9.7% (36/370), with diagnostic peaks occurring at PODs 3 and 11. EBL accounted for 55.6% of leaks, while LBL accounted for 44.4%. In multivariable analysis, an operative time exceeding 5 h was the sole independent global predictor for overall leakage (OR = 6.9; 95% CI 2.4–19.4; p < 0.001). For EBL, independent predictors were tumor proximity to major intrahepatic vessels (OR = 4.1; 95% CI 1.5–11.6; p = 0.007) and an operative time exceeding 5 h (OR = 5.2; 95% CI 1.4–19.2; p = 0.012). For LBL, an operative time exceeding 5 h was the single independent predictor, carrying a substantial risk (OR = 12.2; 95% CI 2.6–56.7; p = 0.001). Histologically, cholangiocarcinoma was significantly overrepresented in the leakage cohort compared to non-leak patients (41.7% vs. 11.7%; p = 0.05). Conclusions: Stratifying post-hepatectomy biliary leakage by diagnostic timing highlights critical differences in patient pathways and hospital readmission rates. While EBL are identified during the initial stay, LBL present insidiously after an uneventful first week, causing a higher 30-day readmission rate (62.5% vs. 30.0%, p = 0.091). Clinical surveillance and patient education at discharge are essential to identify late biliary complications early.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Early Versus Late Biliary Leakage After Hepatic Resection: Incidence, Risk Profiles, and Clinical Impact of Diagnostic Timing
Date Crossref
03/09/2026
Éditeur
MDPI AG
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Gallbladder and Bile Duct DisordersHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and PrognosisOrgan Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.