Mechanical Fault Diagnosis of High-Voltage Circuit Breakers Based on Multi-Sensor Gramian Angular Field and Deep Residual Network
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The mechanical reliability of high-voltage circuit breakers (HVCBs) is crucial for power-grid stability, yet traditional diagnostic methods rely heavily on manually extracted scalar features that can discard transient information. This paper presents a mechanism-aware diagnostic pipeline that combines synchronized coil-current, contact-travel, and spring-pressure measurements; Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD); kinematics-driven Region of Interest (ROI) alignment; Gramian Angular Field (GAF) encoding; RGB channel stacking; and ResNet-18 classification. On a controlled 220 kV experimental platform covering five operating conditions and 1500 operating-cycle samples, the framework achieved an average accuracy of 96.18% (macro-precision 96.10%, recall 96.01%, and F1-score 96.05%) under five repeated stratified 2:1 holdout evaluations. Single-channel controls obtained 88.47% for current, 90.24% for travel, and 85.13% for pressure; removal of VMD and ROI reduced accuracy to 94.72% and 93.46%, respectively. The results should be interpreted as proof-of-concept evidence on controlled simulated faults; validation on temporally separated field data, other breaker types and voltage levels, and naturally imbalanced fault distributions remains necessary before broad condition-based-maintenance deployment.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Mechanical Fault Diagnosis of High-Voltage Circuit Breakers Based on Multi-Sensor Gramian Angular Field and Deep Residual Network
- Date Crossref
- 03/09/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.