Impact of Baseline Synchronous Adenoma Burden on the Risk of Metachronous Advanced Neoplasia
Rattachement africain : tw. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Individuals classified as "high-risk" at initial colonoscopy face an elevated risk of metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasms (meta-ACRN), but risk heterogeneity within this group remains unclear. We aimed to stratify meta-ACRN risk among high-risk individuals based on their synchronous neoplastic burden. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective cohort study utilized data from a Taiwanese multicenter trial (NCT03373136). We included participants with conventional high-risk findings (3-10 low-risk adenomas [LRAs] or any high-risk adenoma [HRA]). The primary outcome was meta-ACRN incidence. Adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRRs) were calculated using multivariable Poisson regression, stratifying patients by baseline synchronous burden, with the 3-4 LRAs group as reference. RESULTS: Among 730 participants undergoing surveillance (mean follow-up 2.4 years), 81 (11.1%) developed meta-ACRN. A single HRA did not significantly increase meta-ACRN risk compared to 3-4 LRAs (aIRR 2.02; 95% confidence interval(CI) 0.83-4.90). However, risk escalated significantly when the index HRA was accompanied by synchronous LRA(s) (aIRR 2.56; 95% CI 1.24-5.39) or synchronous HRA(s) (aIRR 3.93; 95% CI 1.77-8.73) (P for trend = .001). Furthermore, applying a more severe modified advanced adenoma criteria, an identical dose-response pattern emerged, culminating in a >5-fold increased risk for severe metachronous outcomes (aIRR 5.23; 95% CI 1.50-18.22) when accompanied by synchronous HRA(s) . CONCLUSIONS: Meta-ACRN risk within the conventional high-risk population is highly heterogeneous and driven primarily by baseline synchronous neoplastic burden. Surveillance intervals should be personalized, reserving shorter intervals for patients with advanced lesions accompanied by synchronous adenomas.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Impact of Baseline Synchronous Adenoma Burden on the Risk of Metachronous Advanced Neoplasia
- Date Crossref
- 03/09/2026
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.