Clonal memory in human embryonic stem cells biases fate potential during endoderm differentiation
Rattachement africain : us, dk. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Cell fate decisions during development are shaped not only by extrinsic signals but also by heritable intrinsic states passed on across cell division. The extent to which this phenomenon, termed clonal memory, can explain the persistent heterogeneity observed from directed differentiation of human embryonic stem cells is unclear. Here, we combine lineage tracing with single-cell transcriptomics and chromatin accessibility profiling to track clonal behaviour across human embryonic stem cell differentiation towards definitive endoderm. Using a lentiviral barcoding system coupled with a split-well sampling strategy, we find that clonally related cells exhibit reproducible, probabilistic fate outcomes that cannot be explained by signalling environment alone. Fate-biased clones are transcriptionally indistinguishable at the pluripotent stage yet display distinct chromatin accessibility landscapes at lineage-specific cis-regulatory elements. Pre-existing accessibility at these lineage-specific regulatory regions distinguish clones that undergo successful endoderm differentiation from those that generate off-target mesoderm derivatives. Together, these findings provide an explanation for how off-target populations arise during directed differentiation, identifying heritable chromatin states within pluripotent cultures as a source of variability relevant to stem cell-derived in vitro models and cell therapies.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Clonal memory in human embryonic stem cells biases fate potential during endoderm differentiation
- Date Crossref
- 03/09/2026
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.