Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Hot and Cold Polypectomy Techniques in Children: A 13-Year Comparative Study of 2,000 Polyps

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
3Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

PURPOSE: Pediatric polypectomy is routine, yet no prior study has directly compared cold forceps (CFP), hot forceps (HFP), cold snare (CSP), and hot snare polypectomy (HSP). This study evaluated techniques, polyp characteristics, and outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients aged 0-20 years who underwent polypectomy at Riley Hospital for Children from 2/2012-7/2025. Demographic, morphologic, histologic, and outcome data were analyzed at procedure and polyp levels. RESULTS: Across 320 procedures, 2,000 polyps were removed from 203 patients (mean age, 9.5 ± 5.2 years). Polyps were predominantly colorectal, with gastric lesions the most common upper gastrointestinal location. HSP was most common (67.2%), followed by CFP (40.6%), CSP (21.6%), and HFP (1.6%). Beginning in 2020, CSP use increased while CFP/HSP declined. Sessile/flat polyps were predominantly removed with CFP/CSP, whereas pedunculated lesions were almost exclusively resected with HSP. Adenomas were the most common histology overall, predominantly removed with CFP/CSP; juvenile polyps with HSP. No perforations occurred. Immediate bleeding requiring endoscopic therapy occurred in 8.7% of CSP, 2.8% of HSP, and 0.8% of CFP cases. Delayed bleeding occurred only after HSP cases (1.4%). Recurrence in patients without hereditary polyposis syndromes occurred exclusively after CFP, including two adenomas. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric polypectomy outcomes paralleled adult trends, with higher immediate bleeding after CSP, delayed bleeding after HSP, and recurrence exclusively after CFP. Technique selection reflected distinct pediatric morphology and histology. These findings support the safety and feasibility of CSP, reinforce caution with CFP, and provide benchmark data to inform pediatric polypectomy practice and future guideline development.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Hot and Cold Polypectomy Techniques in Children: A 13-Year Comparative Study of 2,000 Polyps
Date Crossref
02/09/2026
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Intestinal and Peritoneal AdhesionsStoma care and complicationsGastrointestinal disorders and treatments

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.