Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Upfront tandem versus superior-first approaches for transvenous lead extraction: a propensity score overlap weighting analysis

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
4Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : jp, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background Although the superior-first approach is the standard strategy for transvenous lead extraction (TLE), the upfront tandem approach, combining femoral snaring with the superior approach from the outset, may offer procedural advantages. Objectives This study compared outcomes between the two approaches after adjustment for confounding factors related to extraction difficulty. Methods We retrospectively analyzed consecutive TLE patients at a single center in Japan between September 2014 and March 2026. Overlap weighting based on propensity scores was applied to balance prespecified baseline characteristics. Outcomes included complete procedural success, cardiac or vascular injury, procedure-related mortality, and blood transfusion. Results Overall, 318 patients were included (82 upfront tandem, 236 superior-first). Patients in the upfront tandem group were younger, had a longer dwell time of the oldest lead, and had a higher prevalence of implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads than those in the superior-first group. After overlap weighting, no significant differences were observed in complete procedural success (94.8% vs 91.5%; odds ratio [OR] 1.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51–5.71) or cardiac or vascular injury (2.1% vs 1.6%; OR 1.34, 95% CI 0.14–12.50), with no procedure-related deaths in either group. Blood transfusion was significantly less frequent in the upfront tandem group (4.5% vs 16.7%; OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.07–0.83). Conclusions After adjustment for confounding by indication, no significant differences were observed in complete procedural success or cardiac or vascular injury between the two approaches. The upfront tandem approach was associated with less blood transfusion and may be a reasonable alternative in selected patients.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Upfront tandem versus superior-first approaches for transvenous lead extraction: a propensity score overlap weighting analysis
Date Crossref
01/09/2026
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesHeavy Metal Exposure and ToxicityHealthcare cost, quality, practices

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.