Prenatal Diagnosis of Congenital Diaphragmatic Eventration: Case Report and Structured Literature Review
Rattachement africain : it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Objective: To describe a prenatal case of congenital diaphragmatic eventration, describe prenatal presentation and summarize available postnatal outcomes of previously reported cases. Methods: We present a prenatally diagnosed case of congenital diaphragmatic eventration managed at our institution and a structured literature review to identify previously reported prenatal cases published between 1984 and 2025. Results: Congenital diaphragmatic eventration was diagnosed at 20 + 2 weeks’ gestation following suspicion of fetal dextrocardia. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging confirmed diaphragmatic continuity and excluded congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Mild neonatal respiratory distress required only transient continuous positive airway pressure. Nineteen prenatally suspected cases were identified from the literature, most of which were initially misdiagnosed as congenital diaphragmatic hernia (89.5%). Correct prenatal characterization was reported in 57% of cases evaluated with fetal MRI and 25% with ultrasound alone; however, these findings should be interpreted as a descriptive observation due to the limited number and heterogeneity of available reports. Conclusions: Congenital diaphragmatic eventration is a rare but important mimic of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging may provide additional anatomical information in selected cases and facilitate counselling and perinatal management.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Prenatal Diagnosis of Congenital Diaphragmatic Eventration: Case Report and Structured Literature Review
- Date Crossref
- 02/09/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.