Experimental and Numerical Study on the Response of Stay Cables under Vehicle Collision on Cable-Stayed Bridges
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Although numerous studies have focused on vehicle impacts on bridge piers, the effects of direct collisions on stay cables in cable-stayed bridges remain relatively underexplored. To address this gap, this study investigated the dynamic responses of stay cables under vehicular impact through a combination of scaled physical tests and numerical simulations. Inclined scaled cable specimens were tested to replicate realistic collision conditions, capturing dynamic responses such as impact force evolution, cable deformation, and localized damage. The test results indicated pronounced plastic deformation and slippage near the anchorage zones, but no complete cable failure was observed. A finite-element model was developed and calibrated based on the experimental data, and then extended to simulate vehicle-to-cable impacts on a representative bridge at various collision angles. The numerical results showed that guardrails could reduce peak impact forces by up to 84.7% under small-angle impacts. However, as the collision angle increased, the redirection effectiveness of the guardrail was diminished, resulting in a higher probability of direct vehicle–cable contact and increased impact severity. The magnitude of the impact force also increased notably with larger collision angles.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Experimental and Numerical Study on the Response of Stay Cables under Vehicle Collision on Cable-Stayed Bridges
- Date Crossref
- 01/11/2026
- Éditeur
- American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.