Data driven selection of consensus docking pipelines for structure based hit identification
Rattachement africain : de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Structure-based virtual screening (SBVS) is a cornerstone of computer-aided drug design, yet its success depends on selecting a combination of docking tools, scoring function (SF), and ranking strategies. MolDockLab addresses this challenge with an automated, data-driven framework that optimizes SBVS workflows for a protein target, balancing predictive performance and computational efficiency. It systematically explores combinations of five docking engines, 15 SF, and three consensus ranking strategies using a calibration set of ≈ 200 compounds with known bioactivity, and applies the best-correlating workflow to the larger screening library. Final hit selection from the top 1% integrates protein-ligand interaction profiler (PLIP)-derived interaction fingerprints, structural-diversity assessment, and expert visual inspection. In a retrospective evaluation on the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), the chosen pipeline achieved a Spearman correlation of 0.36 and an enrichment factor (EF) at 10% of 1.57, consistent with calibration. Prospectively, for the energy coupling factor transporters (ECF-T)-a challenging transmembrane target with a cryptic binding site and no co-crystallized ligand-the pipeline reached a correlation of 0.45 and enrichment of 3.13. Post-processing enabled in vitro confirmation of two chemically novel inhibitors rivaling the most potent ECF-T inhibitors reported to date.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Data driven selection of consensus docking pipelines for structure based hit identification
- Date Crossref
- 02/09/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.