Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Exploring nurses’ experiences of the OSCE exam: a qualitative study

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a performance-based assessment method widely utilized in health professions education to evaluate clinical competence. However, understanding how practicing nurses experience this structured evaluation in clinical settings is essential for improving its implementation and educational value. This study aimed to explore nurses’ lived experiences of the OSCE exam. Methods A qualitative content analysis design was conducted at Imam Reza Hospital in Kermanshah, Iran. Fourteen registered nurses were selected using purposeful sampling with maximum variation to capture diverse clinical perspectives. Data were collected through semi-structured face-to-face interviews. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed inductively using conventional qualitative content analysis. MAXQDA software was used for data organization and management. Results Analysis of the data revealed eight main themes: (1) meaning of the OSCE, (2) personal experience with the OSCE, (3) impact of the OSCE on professional performance, (4) challenges of OSCE implementation, (5) the OSCE in the teaching-learning process, (6) advantages and disadvantages of the OSCE, (7) expectations from the OSCE, and (8) suggestions for improvement. While participants recognized the OSCE as a highly comprehensive and educational tool that links theory to clinical practice, they also highlighted significant operational challenges, including physical fatigue, long waiting times, and stress related to station scheduling. Conclusions Nurses perceive the OSCE as a valuable educational approach for reviewing clinical knowledge and verifying competencies. However, its effectiveness is heavily influenced by scheduling, organization, and station design. Aligning stations with ward-specific clinical demands and managing participant fatigue are critical to maximizing the educational and assessment utility of the OSCE. Clinical trial registration number Not applicable.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Exploring nurses’ experiences of the OSCE exam: a qualitative study
Date Crossref
01/09/2026
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Innovations in Medical EducationNursing education and managementCompetency Development and Evaluation

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Exploration à la demande auprès d’OpenAlex, avec contrôle bibliographique public par Crossref. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.