Expert Consensus Statement: Committee on Implantable Devices and Committee on Social Issues, Japanese Heart Rhythm Society ( JHRS ) Statement on Remote Monitoring of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
Résumé fourni par la source
Remote monitoring (RM) has been established as a standard tool for the management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), offering advantages such as early event detection, fewer routine outpatient visits, and reduced mortality. As RM becomes more common, its appropriate implementation and the need for safe, efficient management have become increasingly important. This statement of the Japanese Heart Rhythm Society (JHRS) provides comprehensive guidance for medical professionals and device manufacturers involved in RM. Specifically, it outlines recommendations on personnel placement, workflow optimization, patient and caregiver education, alert notification settings, physiological parameter monitoring, and insurance claims. It also addresses the responsibilities of device manufacturers, the use of third-party resources, and strategies for reducing workload based on alert notifications. Recommendation classes and evidence levels were determined by the consensus of the writing team, and the proposed recommendations were reviewed and peer-reviewed by the JHRS' Committee on Implantable Devices.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Expert Consensus Statement: Committee on Implantable Devices and Committee on Social Issues, Japanese Heart Rhythm Society ( <scp>JHRS</scp> ) Statement on Remote Monitoring of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
- Date Crossref
- 01/09/2026
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.