Multidimensional Quantification of Engineering Distresses and Secondary Periglacial Hazards Along Linear Infrastructure in the Permafrost Region of Northeast China Using UAV-LiDAR and Synchronous Visible-Light Imagery

Résumé fourni par la source

Permafrost degradation is intensifying differential settlement, structural deformation, and secondary periglacial hazards along linear infrastructure in cold regions, underscoring the need for monitoring approaches that integrate corridor-scale screening with fine-scale quantification. This study investigated highways, railways, transmission tower foundations, and buried pipelines in the permafrost region of Northeast China using multi-temporal UAV-borne LiDAR point clouds and synchronous visible-light imagery acquired by a DJI Matrice 300 unmanned aerial vehicle equipped with a DJI Zenmuse L1 sensor (DJI, Shenzhen, China). A synergistic optical–LiDAR framework was developed for distress identification and multidimensional quantification. The overall root mean square errors (RMSEs) at flight altitudes of 50 m and 100 m were 3.25 cm and 4.13 cm, respectively. By integrating texture and boundary information from synchronous visible-light imagery, elevation and volumetric metrics from LiDAR-derived digital elevation models (DEMs) and digital surface models (DSMs), and structural attitude parameters extracted from three-dimensional (3D) models, the framework enabled the parametric quantification of pavement cracking, differential shoulder settlement, railway embankment slump, transmission tower inclination, thaw settlement and ponding in pipeline trenches, and secondary icing. Snow-depth retrievals agreed well with field measurements (R2 = 0.87, RMSE = 1.32 cm), indicating that UAV-LiDAR can extend monitoring into snow-covered periods. These findings provide a methodological basis for distress detection, screening of hazard-prone sections, and risk-informed operation and maintenance of linear infrastructure in permafrost regions.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.