Data from The Landscape of Genomic and Socioeconomic Variables in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Based on Genetic Ancestry

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background: Despite differences in tumor alterations across genetic ancestries, investigations of the colorectal cancer molecular landscape have used self-reported ethnicity instead of genetic ancestry. Methods: We used tumor and matched normal whole-exome sequencing data from 16,388 patients with stage I to IV colorectal cancer to investigate colorectal cancer’s germline and somatic molecular landscape and the potential influence of socioeconomic factors (Distressed Communities Index, DCI) across diverse genetic ancestries. Genetic ancestry determined via supervised local ancestry inference included African (AFR, N = 1,697), Native American (AMR, N = 1,291), East Asian (EAS, N = 2,247), European (EUR, N = 9,726), Levantine Middle Eastern (LME, N = 1,192), and South Asian (SAS, N = 184). Results: Microsatellite instability (MSI) was the most common form of hypermutation (80.8%), higher in the EUR genetic ancestry than in the AFR, AMR, and EAS genetic ancestry. Among germline findings, positive results were most common in high-penetrance genes associated with Lynch syndrome. Enrichment patterns included MLH1 (SAS) and PMS2 (AFR). There were significant differences in the frequency of driver mutations in APC, BRAF, KRAS, TP53, and PIK3CA between the EUR and other ancestry groups in both MSI and microsatellite stable tumors. Mutational signatures suggested enrichment of reactive oxygen species and POLE in AFR, colibactin in EAS, and aflatoxin and NTHL1 in SAS. DCI scores differed by ancestry (higher distress in AFR/AMR than in EUR), but driver mutation frequencies did not vary across DCI quintiles. Conclusions: Genetic ancestry shapes hereditary risk, tumor biology, and environmental exposures. Impact: These findings suggest that incorporating ancestry into screening, trials, and precision oncology may improve equity, though outcome-linked prospective studies and implementation research are warranted.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.