Immunizing small cell lung cancer mice with isoaspartylated Elavl4 after chemotherapy mimics improved survival of anti-ELAVL4 antibody-positive small cell lung cancer patients

Résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Introduction Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients have an ∼8% 5-year survival; new therapies are urgently needed. Approximately 15% of SCLC patients have naturally-occurring low-titer antibodies against neuronal ELAVL proteins, associated with improved response to therapy and significantly improved survival. We previously determined that the anti-ELAVL4 response is triggered by isoaspartylation in the unstructured ELAVL4 N-terminal region. Methods We used a Tp53 fl/fl ; Rb1 fl/fl inducible SCLC mouse model to test whether 1) immunization with isoaspartylated Elavl4 (isoAsp-Elavl4) prior to SCLC induction improves survival in the absence of any other treatment, and 2) immunization with isoAsp-Elavl4 following completion of 3 rounds of cisplatin+etoposide therapy improves survival. Immunizations contained incomplete Freund’s adjuvant with either a recombinant N-terminal fragment of Elavl4 (amino acids 1-117), incubated under isoaspartyl-inducing conditions, or phosphate-buffered saline (used as the negative control, since Elavl4 spontaneously isoaspartylates). Mice were monitored by blinded assessors until euthanasia was indicated. Results IsoAsp-Elavl4-immunized animals all became immune responsive, and spontaneous anti-isoAsp-Elavl4 antibodies were observed in 7% of the control animals. Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed that pre-SCLC immunization with isoAsp-ELAVL4 in the absence of other treatments did not affect survival. In contrast, immunization of SCLC mice following chemotherapy significantly improved survival. Conclusions An anti-isoAsp-ELAVL4 response can be actively induced in mice and significantly increases SCLC survival when given following chemotherapy. This indicates that the anti-isoAsp-ELAVL4 immune response can be leveraged to develop new therapies for SCLC patients.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.