Cost-effectiveness of nicotine metabolite ratio-guided smoking cessation therapy in China: a hybrid decision-analytic modeling study based on real-world data

Résumé fourni par la source

Aims To estimate the projected cost-effectiveness of NMR-guided metabolism-informed care (MIC) compared with standard care (SC) for smoking cessation in China.Materials and methods A 24-week decision tree was linked to an annual semi-Markov cohort model that followed individuals from age 45 to age 100. Clinical inputs were informed by the China National Tobacco Cessation Cohort Study. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weights were estimated using a multinomial propensity-score model, trimmed at the 1st and 99th percentiles, and analyzed using robust sandwich variance estimators. Under MIC, fast metabolizers (NMR ≥ 0.31) received varenicline, while slow metabolizers (NMR < 0.31) received either nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) or bupropion. Costs were expressed in 2023 Chinese yuan (CNY), and costs and health outcomes were discounted at 5% annually.Results Over the lifetime model horizon, SC generated 13.125 QALYs per person at a total cost of CNY 40,832.29. Both MIC medication-cost scenarios generated an additional 0.003 QALYs. MIC-Bupropion cost CNY 41,033.81 and yielded an ICER of CNY 67,930.00 per QALY gained versus SC. The corresponding deterministic INMB versus SC was CNY 63.57 at the primary threshold. In the fully incremental analysis, MIC-NRT was strictly dominated by MIC-Bupropion. At CNY 89,358.00 per QALY, MIC-Bupropion had the highest net monetary benefit in 50.4% of probabilistic simulations.Limitations Findings depended on observational clinical inputs, literature-derived long-term parameters, and structural assumptions, and did not fully capture all smoking-related diseases, adherence, adverse effects, or implementation costs.Conclusions MIC-Bupropion showed favorable expected economic performance relative to SC, whereas MIC-NRT was strictly dominated. Further comparative-effectiveness, budget-impact, and implementation studies are warranted before routine adoption.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.