Comparative study of hybrid quantum-classical models for cold-start drug–target affinity prediction: a partial pilot analysis
Résumé fourni par la source
Cold-start drug–target affinity (DTA) prediction requires evaluation on genuinely unseen chemical and protein entities. We considered QVGAT-DPI (Quantum Variational Graph Attention Network for Drug–Protein Interaction) as a residual hybrid model combining full molecular graphs, permutation-invariant Breaking of Retro-synthetically Interesting Chemical Substructures (BRICS) fragment queries, ESM-2 and ChemBERTa representations, fingerprints, cross-attention, and two simulated six-qubit residual modules. QVGAT-DPI was compared with specification-based implementation of Q-BAFNet, the closest structured hybrid architecture, under identical local fold manifests. Because of the limitation of the computational resource, the planned ten paired folds were completed only for DAVIS S2 (unseen drugs) and S4 (unseen drugs and targets). For S2, paired differences were + 0.060 CI (bootstrap 95% interval − 0.000 to 0.123; exact p = 0.0996) and − 0.094 RMSE (− 0.145 to − 0.046; p = 0.0098). For S4, differences were + 0.087 CI (0.032–0.143; p = 0.0195) and − 0.135 RMSE (− 0.294 to − 0.005; p = 0.1191). After Holm adjustment, only S2 RMSE remained below 0.05, and no protocol supported both endpoints. The prespecified aggregate S2–S4 conclusion was unevaluable because S3 was incomplete. These results support further controlled evaluation, not system-wide superiority or quantum advantage.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Comparative study of hybrid quantum-classical models for cold-start drug–target affinity prediction: a partial pilot analysis
- Date Crossref
- 01/09/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.