Visual prompt engineering for multimodal and irregularly sampled medical data
Résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: A patient undergoes multiple examinations in each hospital stay, where each provides different facets of the health status. These assessments include temporal data with varying sampling rates, discrete single-point measurements, therapeutic interventions such as medication administration, and images. While physicians are able to process and integrate diverse modalities intuitively, neural networks need specific modeling for each modality complicating the training procedure. METHODS: We demonstrate that this complexity can be significantly reduced by visualizing all information as images along with unstructured text and subsequently training a conventional vision-text transformer. Our approach, Vision Transformer for irregular sampled Multi-modal Measurements (ViTiMM), simplifies data preprocessing and modeling by unifying clinical measurements, medications, X-ray images, and electrocardiography scans into a single visual representation. RESULTS: ViTiMM outperforms current state-of-the-art methods in predicting in-hospital mortality, phenotyping, and decompensation on two datasets, the MIMIC-IV and COVID Data for Shared Learning (CDSL) dataset. CONCLUSIONS: We hope our work inspires advancements in multi-modal medical AI by reducing the training complexity to (visual) prompt engineering, thus lowering entry barriers and enabling no-code solutions for training. The source code is publicly available at https://github.com/Cardio-AI/ViTiMM .
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Visual prompt engineering for multimodal and irregularly sampled medical data
- Date Crossref
- 01/09/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.