Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 review

Urinary Biomarkers in Urological Oncology: From Biological Origin to Clinical Decision-Making—A Narrative Review

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
8Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Urinary biomarkers are promising tools in urological oncology because urine can be collected non-invasively and repeatedly during diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance. Despite extensive biomarker discovery, their adoption in routine practice remains limited. Biomarker performance depends not only on analytical accuracy but also on the clinical decision, anatomical route into urine, biological source of the signal, specimen fraction, and timing and conditions of sampling. This review evaluates urinary biomarkers across bladder cancer, upper-tract urothelial carcinoma, prostate cancer, and renal cell carcinoma using a biologically grounded, decision-oriented framework. It considers tumor-derived nucleic acids, epigenetic alterations, proteins, immune and inflammatory mediators, extracellular vesicles, metabolites, microbiome-associated signals, and multiparametric models. Bladder cancer represents the most anatomically direct and clinically mature setting, with potential applications in hematuria evaluation, cystoscopy triage, recurrence surveillance, molecular residual disease assessment, and monitoring of response to bacillus Calmette–Guérin therapy. In upper-tract urothelial carcinoma, distinguishing voided from selectively collected urine is essential because dilution, transit, obstruction, and limited localization affect interpretation. Prostate urine assays are best positioned for biopsy triage and refinement of active surveillance rather than general population screening. Renal cell carcinoma biomarkers remain exploratory because the sources and mechanisms of urinary signal release are insufficiently resolved. Clinical translation should be assessed using decision-specific outcomes, including incremental value, calibration, net clinical benefit, procedures avoided, significant cancers missed, reproducibility, and feasibility, rather than diagnostic accuracy or area under the receiver operating characteristic curve alone.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Urinary Biomarkers in Urological Oncology: From Biological Origin to Clinical Decision-Making—A Narrative Review
Date Crossref
01/09/2026
Éditeur
MDPI AG
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Bladder and Urothelial Cancer TreatmentsUrinary Tract Infections ManagementFerroptosis and cancer prognosis

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.