Remote sensing multi-image encryption based on a dual-memristor brain-inspired chaotic neural network
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Remote sensing multi-image transmission faces strong spatial correlation, heterogeneous image dimensions, packet disorder, and integrity risks. To address these issues, a dual-memristor brain-inspired chaotic neural network is constructed by introducing two flux-controlled memristive synapses with nonlinear saturating memductance and weak flux coupling into a four-neuron Hopfield network, providing key-dependent and reproducible chaotic states. Based on this network, a multi-image encryption framework is developed by integrating reversible RGB-pixel interleaving, metadata-aware sub-packaging, session key derivation, trajectory-based packet masks, packet scheduling, authentication, and self-described reconstruction. The receiver regenerates identical chaotic states and spatial mappings from the master key and authenticated session information, enabling packet-wise decryption and lossless recovery without transmitting complete permutation sequences. Experiments on five 256 × 256 RGB remote sensing images achieve zero-MSE recovery, an average ciphertext entropy of 7.9972 bits, an average absolute adjacent-pixel correlation of 0.002763, and NPCR and UACI values of 99.6006% and 33.4432%, respectively. The authentication-tag overhead is 4.17%. These results demonstrate effective statistical and differential security, integrity verification, and reversible multi-image protection.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Remote sensing multi-image encryption based on a dual-memristor brain-inspired chaotic neural network
- Date Crossref
- 01/09/2026
- Éditeur
- IOP Publishing
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.