Tisagenlecleucel for post-transplant relapse in young acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients: European real-world determinants of outcome
Résumé fourni par la source
This multicenter real-world study identifies critical determinants of outcome for tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) in treating post-HSCT relapse in 220 children/young adults with B-ALL from 31 European centers. Median follow-up was 30.0 months, with a 43.6% 2-year event-free survival (EFS), 67.2% overall-survival (OS), and 57.1% incidence of CAR-T failure. CAR-T for relapse after transplant from a matched sibling donor (MSD) compared to alternative donors was associated with lower 2-year-OS (MSD 59.1%, mismatched donor MMD 80.2%, matched family/unrelated donor MFD/MUD 68.3%, p = 0.046). Two-year incidence of CAR-T failure was highest for MSD (MSD 73.8%, MFD/MUD 49.7%, MMD 52.2%, p = 0.006). Patients who had relapsed early (< 6 months post HSCT) showed inferior 2-year-EFS (23.7%) and OS (47.2%) compared to patients with late relapse, ≥ 6 months after HSCT (EFS 49.8%, p = 0.001; OS 73.9%, p < 0.001). Early relapse was associated with a higher incidence of CAR-T failure and relapse after tisa-cel, particularly CD19+ relapses. Outcomes correlated with disease burden at lymphodepletion: 2-year-OS was 81.7% for MRD-, 69.2% for MRD+, and 55.2% for patients in non-remission (p = 0.003), with incidence of CAR-T failure highest in non-remission. Prior transplant from an MSD, early post-HSCT relapse, and disease burden at lymphodepletion identify patients at increased risk of CAR-T failure after HSCT.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Tisagenlecleucel for post-transplant relapse in young acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients: European real-world determinants of outcome
- Date Crossref
- 31/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.