Cross-Class Value of Battery Energy Storage in Low-Voltage Grids: Grid Relief, Dispatch-Coupled Ageing, and Cost-Effectiveness
Résumé fourni par la source
The German low-voltage (LV) distribution grid faces stress from the build-out of distributed photovoltaic (PV) units. Battery storage is widely proposed as a solution, yet the literature is partitioned by storage scale, placement, and how ageing is treated. This study introduces a unified cross-class assessment of the three structurally distinct LV storage classes under one methodology: residential PV home storage (Class I, 5 kWh), feeder-level DSO string storage (Class II, 10–50 kWh, one unit per feeder end), and market-coupled district storage (Class III, 50–500 kWh, EPEX-scheduled). All classes share the same 1 min load and PV time series, the same voltage-guided PnetU dispatch with class-specific extensions, and the same Naumann–Wang LFP ageing model with rainflow counting, evaluated to a 20-year state-of-health horizon across representative and limiting multi-feeder German LV networks, with degradation treated as a dispatch outcome. Correctly modelled networks prove largely voltage-robust; on the limiting Kerber feeders studied, storage does not restore grid-code compliance at any tested size. Grid-supportive operation yields little grid benefit and is ageing-neutral only where it is not needed, becoming costly without adequate benefit on the stressed feeders studied. The value of LV storage therefore rests on dispatch-resolved lifetime, self-consumption and curtailment reduction, and market participation rather than grid service.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Cross-Class Value of Battery Energy Storage in Low-Voltage Grids: Grid Relief, Dispatch-Coupled Ageing, and Cost-Effectiveness
- Date Crossref
- 31/08/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.