Epigenetic and Immunometabolic Signatures of Suicidal Behavior in Major Depressive Disorder

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Suicidal behavior results from complex behavioral and biological changes. Previous crosssectional studies indicate that proinflammatory immunobiological factors are often increased in close temporal proximity to a suicide attempt. Suicidal individuals may also exhibit a biological trait vulnerability to stress and inflammation, due to persistent epigenetic modifications. We enrolled 130 individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD), 83 with suicidal behavior at intake, and followed them for 12 months with up to eight clinical assessments. Quantification of plasma inflammatory markers and metabolites was performed by high-sensitivity electrochemiluminescence and Ultra High-Performance-Liquid-Mass Spectrometry (UPLC-MS), respectively. Epigenetic changes were identified using Illumina EPIC arrays. We identified 15 genes with altered DNA-methylation associated with suicidal behavior and attempts at baseline. Childhood trauma predicted lifetime suicide attempts and was associated with altered methylation of seven genes. Increased neutrophils and lower plasma serotonin at baseline predicted future suicide attempts over the following year (neutrophil estimate = 0.42, P = 0.016; serotonin OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.39–1.13). Utilizing biomarkers from baseline and epigenetic data from the genes with highest predictive values ( STBD1, PRDM8 , and TRIM15 ), we achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.84 for suicide attempts over the year. Suicidal behavior in MDD was associated with specific epigenetic signatures. Several of the identified genes, such as MAD1L1 , have been implicated in psychiatric disease, suicidal behavior and the immune response. These findings support the usefulness of epigenetic and immunometabolic blood markers for identifying suicidal individuals in clinical settings, potentially enhancing preventative efforts.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.