Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Comparative analysis of surgical outcomes: open versus robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
3Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

OBJECTIVE: To compare surgical complications, biochemical failure, and mortality rates between open radical prostatectomy (ORP) and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: All men undergoing radical prostatectomy (1995-2023) at a single academic hospital were included, and preoperative factors, surgical parameters, complications, biochemical failures, and mortality were collected. Generalized linear models and cause-specific Cox regressions stratified by surgical procedure were used. Cumulative incidences of biochemical failure were estimated with the Aalen-Johansen estimator, accounting for death as a competing risk. Analyses of surgical complications were adjusted for age and lymphadenectomy, while positive surgical margins, biochemical failure, and mortality were adjusted for preoperative PSA, pathological lymph node stage, pT category, tumor percentage, ISUP score, age, and year of surgery. RESULTS: A total of 3,477 men were included (ORP: 1,759; RARP: 1,718). RARP was associated with reduced odds of in-hospital complications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.11-0.74). RARP was associated with a reduced risk of biochemical failure compared to ORP (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.29-0.93). No other outcomes or mortality rates differed significantly. CONCLUSION: RARP was superior in terms of complications and non-inferior for oncological outcomes compared to ORP at our center. Although the only randomized trial yet, has not proven any significant improvement in long-term cancer control comparing the open versus robotic approach, RARP seems to have replaced ORP as the gold standard for surgical treatment of localized prostate cancer. However, the overall benefit of RARP in the surgical evolution remains elusive.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Comparative analysis of surgical outcomes: open versus robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
Date Crossref
31/08/2026
Éditeur
MJS Publishing, Medical Journals Sweden AB
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchColorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune donnée externe enregistrée en base. Sources et limites.