Game changer? Cognitive-motor effects of VR exergaming compared to video-based training

Résumé fourni par la source

Background/Objective Virtual reality (VR) exergaming enhances several cognitive domains through multisensory engagement. Acute cognitive benefits of VR are established, but evidence for direct comparisons with non-immersive controls is limited. This study aimed to determine whether VR exercise provides additional cognitive and cognitive-motor benefits beyond a matched non-immersive active stick-fight video (SFV) intervention, and whether effects persist after training.Methods In this randomized quasi-experimental study, N = 55 healthy adults (VR: n = 30; SFV: n = 25; 25.5 ± 7.1 years; 41.8% female) completed an 8-week program (2 × 30 min/week), of VR or SFV matched in movement patterns, frequency, intensity and duration. Measurements included reaction time (RT), Stroop Test (versions 1–3), Letter Cancellation Test (LCT), Trail Making Test (TMT), Trail Walking Test (TWT) and Fitts task (difficulty level 1–4). Data were analyzed using mixed-design ANOVAs.Results Improvements were observed in Stroop reading (F(1,53) = 14.84, p < .001, η2 = 0.219), Stroop inhibition (F(1,53) = 10.99, p = .002, η2 = 0.172), and LCT (F(1,53) = 4.57, p = .037, η2 = 0.079). A time × group interaction was found for TMT (F(1,53) = 6.55, p = .031, η2 = 0.110), indicating greater changes following VR training. Both groups improved cognitive-motor performance (TWT: F(1,25) = 55.32, p < .001, η2 = 0.689; Fitts3: F(1,53) = 44.97, p < .001, η2 = 0.459), with greater gains for VR in Fitts3 (p = .006).Conclusion(s) Eight weeks of VR and SFV enhanced cognitive and cognitive-motor performance. VR provided domain-specific advantages in executive function, but these effects were not uniformly persistent. SFV sustained more improvements in real-world-relevant cognitive-motor tasks.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.