Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Single versus double lung transplantation in patients with pneumoconiosis: a retrospective cohort study

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
7Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Lung transplantation (LT) is emerging as a critical final treatment for end-stage lung diseases including pneumoconiosis. Outcomes of single lung transplantation (SLT) and double lung transplantation (DLT) in pneumoconiosis remain understudied. This study evaluates clinical differences between the two procedures in pneumoconiosis patients to guide therapeutic decision-making for this occupational population. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 119 pneumoconiosis patients undergoing LT at The Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University between Jan 2018 and Dec 2022. The choice of SLT versus DLT was primarily driven by clinical judgment of high surgical risk, primarily due to severe pleural adhesions or calcification deemed too risky for bilateral pneumonectomy. Data on demographics, intraoperative and postoperative characteristics and patient survival were collected to compare SLT and DLT outcomes using Mann-Whitney U test and Pearson's chi-square test. The primary outcome was 1-year posttransplant survival. Posttransplant survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Of all the transplant recipients, 61 (51.3%) underwent SLT and 58 (48.7%) underwent DLT. DLT recipients were younger (44 [33-51] vs. 49 [43-53], p = 0.012), had higher mean pulmonary pressure (25.0 [20.0-25.0] vs. 20.0 [15.0-25.0] mmHg, p = 0.005) and experienced longer ischemic time (16.1 [13.4-18.0] vs. 7.2 [6.2-8.5] hours, p < 0.001). The durations of intraoperative and postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) were significantly longer in DLT recipients (p < 0.001; p = 0.003). The perioperative mortality of recipients who underwent SLT was more than three times higher than that of those undergoing DLT (18.0% vs. 5.2%, p = 0.059). Those who received DLT had significantly improved survival compared to SLT, with a hazard ratio of 0.24 (95% CI: 0.07-0.81, p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: Our preliminary data suggested that DLT might be associated with better survival in patients with pneumoconiosis compared to SLT. A randomized controlled trial or large-scale multicenter registry study is needed to confirm this survival benefit and refine patient selection criteria.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Single versus double lung transplantation in patients with pneumoconiosis: a retrospective cohort study
Date Crossref
01/09/2026
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Transplantation: Methods and OutcomesPleural and Pulmonary DiseasesMedical Imaging and Pathology Studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.