Exploring the convergence of faith healing practices with biopsychosocial interventions for mental health: A qualitative study among faith healers in Madhya Pradesh, India

Résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Faith healing, a practice deeply rooted in cultural and religious beliefs, remains a significant healthcare approach worldwide, especially in regions like India, where mental health stigma is pervasive. Despite advances in psychiatric care, many individuals still seek the services of faith healers for mental health issues, delaying access to appropriate medical treatment. The study aims to understand the perspectives of Faith Healers on mental health, examine their practices and beliefs, and explore the feasibility of integrating faith healing with psychiatric care to enhance mental health outcomes in Madhya Pradesh. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This qualitative study was conducted across selected districts of Madhya Pradesh, India. The participants were Faith Healers’ who were interviewed by Psychiatrists from “Mankaksh” (District Mental Health Units) between July 2022 and February 2023. In-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted with 24 faith healers using a predefined interview guide. These IDIs were later analyzed. Thematic analysis was used to identify key themes from the data. RESULTS: The following four themes emerged: Reason for working in the profession, Perception regarding issues of disciples, View on integration of Faith healing and Psychiatric treatment, and Interventions suggested. Opinions on integrating faith healing with psychiatric care varied, with some expressing openness to collaboration, while others remained skeptical of medical interventions. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the complex relationship between faith healing and mental health care in Madhya Pradesh. Collaboration between faith healers and mental health practitioners is essential for developing holistic care models that respect cultural beliefs while ensuring evidence-based treatment.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.