Generative AI chatbots could take over our emotional lives: The potential and challenges of generative AI for health globally
Rattachement africain : nl, no. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Since the release of ChatGPT in 2022, generative AI has immensely affected science and society, including the human mind.There are indications that Generative AI, that is 'general purpose chatbots' like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude, are now most used for emotional support and companionship, according to research of Harvard Business Review (Zao-Sanders, 2025).These chatbots presumably were originally designed for tasks such as summarizing information, assisting with translations, and inspiring ideas.Consequently, evidence is already emerging of suicides, psychosis, and sensitive per sonal data leaks.Un-regulated generative AI chatbots marketed specifically for therapy have also been released.On August 5th, Slingshot AI launched "the first AI designed for therapy, offering deeply personalized mental health support to anyone with a phone" (Healthcare IT Today, 2025).Although the company states that it was beta-tested with 50.000 users, the chatbot was not evaluated for benefits nor adverse effects in random ized controlled trials.As generative AI chatbots are becoming faster, more adaptive, increasingly autono mous (Gabriel et al., 2025), and widely available, there is a risk of increasing emotionaloverreliance.This might spark a public health crisis with wide societal consequences.Even the founders of companies like OpenAI warn that AI will become even more unpre
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Generative AI chatbots could take over our emotional lives: The potential and challenges of generative AI for health globally
- Date Crossref
- 31/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.