Deep Learning Image Reconstruction Algorithm for Quantitative Assessment of Low-Dose Biphasic Chest CT in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Résumé fourni par la source
Objective: To evaluate the impact of deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) on quantitatively assessing emphysema, air trapping and small airway dysfunction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) using low-dose inspiratory-expiratory chest CT. Methods: Sixty-nine COPD patients underwent low-dose inspiratory-expiratory chest CT scans and pulmonary function tests (PFT) were prospectively enrolled. The CT images were reconstructed using 50% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR-V), DLIR-high (DLIR-H), medium (DLIR-M), and low (DLIR-L) strengths. The volumes and its percentages (relative to whole lung) characterizing emphysema, air trapping and small airway dysfunction were quantified on the inspiratory-expiratory CT scans. Results: /FVC (r = -0.570 to -0.649, all p < 0.001). Air trapping and small airway dysfunction parameters showed weak negative correlations with MEF25%, MEF50%, and MEF75% (r = -0.320 to -0.381, all p < 0.001). When differentiating GOLD I-II from III-IV, all parameters showed AUC values ranging from 0.69 to 0.76, without statistically differences among reconstructions (DeLong's test, p > 0.05), while the optimal thresholds varied across reconstructions. Conclusion: In low-dose inspiratory-expiratory chest CT, DLIR may alter the lung function-related CT parameters compared to ASiR-V, but does not affect their correlations with PFTs or their efficacies in GOLD grading.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Deep Learning Image Reconstruction Algorithm for Quantitative Assessment of Low-Dose Biphasic Chest CT in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Date Crossref
- 01/09/2026
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.