Field Evaluation of Iminoctadine Tris 40% WP against Anthracnose Disease of Chilli and Its Impact on Yield
Résumé fourni par la source
This two-season field study evaluated the efficacy of iminoctadine tris 40% WP against chilli anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum capsici at Horticulture Research Station, Mondouri, West Bengal, during 2017–18 and 2018–19. Six fungicidal treatments and an untreated control were evaluated in a randomised block design with three replications. Iminoctadine tris 40% WP at 400 g a.i./ha consistently produced the lowest disease severity among the tested treatments. In 2017–18, the treatment recorded a final percent disease index (PDI) of 12.93% and 73.15% disease control over the untreated control. In 2018–19, the corresponding values were 11.50% and 77.61%. Zineb 75% WP and tebuconazole 25% WG also reduced disease severity, while myclobutanil showed comparatively lower efficacy. Disease suppression was accompanied by higher yield under the experimental conditions. Iminoctadine tris 40% WP at 400 g a.i./ha produced 18.68 q/ha in 2017–18 and 19.72 q/ha in 2018–19, representing yield increases of 62.72% and 49.39%, respectively, over the untreated control. Phytotoxicity observations at the evaluated higher doses during both seasons showed no recorded symptoms across the assessed parameters. Overall, the results indicate that iminoctadine tris 40% WP at 400 g a.i./ha provided the best combined disease-control and yield response among the treatments evaluated under these field conditions.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Field Evaluation of Iminoctadine Tris 40% WP against Anthracnose Disease of Chilli and Its Impact on Yield
- Date Crossref
- 31/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Sciencedomain International
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.