Postoperative Surveillance in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: Response-Adapted De-Escalation in the 2025 American Thyroid Association and 2026 Korean Thyroid Association Guidelines
Rattachement africain : kr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Postoperative surveillance for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) is shifting from routine, uniformly intensive follow-up toward risk-adapted, response-based care.Because most patients with DTC have an excellent prognosis, surveillance should not rely on indefinite testing to maximize recurrence detection.Rather, it should prioritize detection of clinically meaningful recurrence while reducing unnecessary biochemical testing, imaging, and prolonged thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) suppression [1,2].Although initial clinicopathological risk stratification remains essential, recurrence risk should be recalibrated over time according to surgical extent, radioactive iodine (RAI) use, serum thyroglobulin (Tg) level, anti-thyroglobulin antibody (TgAb) status, imaging findings, and treatment response [3,4].The 2026 Korean Thyroid Association (KTA) and 2025 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines share this overall direction [1,2], but they differ in several clinically important respects: the timing of early postoperative assessment, Tg interpretation after treatment without RAI or after lobectomy, and the extent of long-term surveillance de-escalation (Table 1).
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Postoperative Surveillance in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: Response-Adapted De-Escalation in the 2025 American Thyroid Association and 2026 Korean Thyroid Association Guidelines
- Date Crossref
- 31/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Korean Endocrine Society
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.