Screening of diphenylterephthalamide derivatives against Mycobacterium tuberculosis: an in silico and in vitro study
Résumé fourni par la source
The β‑carbonic anhydrase (CanB) enzyme has been validated as a potential target for the development of novel antitubercular compounds against Mycobacterium tuberculosis . This enzyme plays a crucial role in maintaining intracellular pH homeostasis, bacterial survival, and pathogenesis, making it a highly promising and druggable target for novel antitubercular therapies. Various inhibitors have been identified, including sulfonamides, dithiocarbamates, carboxylic acids, phenolic compounds, and diphenylterephthalamide derivatives. In this study, we employed a combination of in silico techniques and in vitro biological evaluation to further develop CanB inhibitors belonging to the N,N′ -diphenylterephthalamide class. To this end, the structural similarity approach was applied to mine the National Cancer Institute database and prioritize available compounds. Biological evaluation demonstrated that twelve of these compounds exhibited potent antimycobacterial activity with MIC values ranging from 0.125 to 2 μg/mL. Furthermore, selected compounds were efficient inhibitors of CanB, reducing its esterase activity to less than 35%, and showed high affinity for the enzyme ( K d between 0.12 and 3.10 μM), as demonstrated by a thermal shift assay. Overall, this work clearly suggests that the diphenylterephthalamide scaffold represents an effective tool for developing CanB inhibitors with antimycobacterial properties.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Screening of diphenylterephthalamide derivatives against Mycobacterium tuberculosis: an in silico and in vitro study
- Date Crossref
- 01/10/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.