Code and Public-Data Validation for "Data-Constrained Gauge-Invariant Information-Gauge Signatures in Neutrino Oscillations"

Le résumé fourni par la source

This repository contains the numerical analysis and figure-generation code associated with the manuscript “Data-Constrained Gauge-Invariant Information-Gauge Signatures in Neutrino Oscillations.” The code implements a transparent phenomenological framework for testing information-gauge (IG) effects in neutrino propagation, including coherent mass-basis splittings, sidereal modulation, and stochastic pure dephasing. It also provides an auxiliary validation analysis based on the public IceCube 7.6-year high-energy atmospheric-neutrino data release associated with the IceCube decoherence search. The archive includes: icecube_ig_direct_fit_verified.py — direct-data analysis scaffold for the IceCube public release, including the published 13 × 20 reconstructed-energy/zenith binning, event-by-event IG reweighting, finite-Monte-Carlo effective likelihood, nuisance-parameter profiling, coherent A21TA_{21}^{T}–A31TA_{31}^{T} scans, and pure-dephasing scans; figure_ig_data_signatures_final.py — code used to generate the main manuscript figure showing the conditional IceCube/JUNO projection scales, illustrative sidereal modulation, and the terrestrial-baseline coherence factor; figure_public_data_validation.py — code used to generate the auxiliary public-data validation scan; scan_common_gamma.txt — the 31-point profile scan of the common nonnegative damping parameter Γ0\Gamma_0; discovery.txt — diagnostic output describing the structure and available fields of the IceCube public data release. The public-data validation reproduces the 305,735 selected events in the published 13 × 20 analysis grid and finds its simplified likelihood minimum at the physical boundary Γ0=0\Gamma_0=0. The diagnostic scan crosses the reference ΔTS=2.71\Delta TS=2.71 line at approximately Γ0=3.39×10−24 GeV.\Gamma_0 = 3.39\times10^{-24}\ {\rm GeV}. This crossing is not interpreted as a calibrated confidence limit, because the null point lies on the physical boundary and the simplified scaffold does not reproduce the complete IceCube likelihood, nuisance model, propagation treatment, or pseudoexperiment calibration. It is included only as a reproducibility and order-of-magnitude validation check and is not used to derive the official IceCube phase-perturbation bound quoted in the manuscript. The IceCube public data used by the validation code are available separately from the Harvard Dataverse under DOI 10.7910/DVN/9WGYQN. The analysis code is intended to support reproducibility of the manuscript's phenomenological projections and figures. Publication-quality direct IceCube IG limits would require the full experimental systematic model and validated neutrino propagation framework.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.