Aller au contenu principal
2026 article

Effectiveness of Nurse-Coordinated, Digital-Supported Collaborative Care Model in Reducing Hospital Stay and Mortality Among Patients With Heart Failure: TIME-HF Cluster RCT India

2Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
20Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction causes high mortality and recurrent hospitalizations in India. We evaluated the effectiveness of the collaborative care model in improving days alive and out of the hospital and overall survival. METHODS: We conducted a parallel-group, cluster-randomized controlled trial involving 1507 adults with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction across 22 centers in India (CTRI/2021/11/037797). Centers were randomized 1:1 to the intervention or usual care. Participants were followed up for 2 years. The intervention included risk stratification, lifestyle and pharmacological optimization, and a nurse-coordinated, mobile health–supported disease management program with self-care education, active follow-up, and continuous outpatient monitoring throughout the study period. The primary outcome was days alive and out of the hospital, and all-cause mortality was assessed as a secondary outcome. Days alive and out of the hospital was analyzed with a one-inflated β model. All-cause mortality was analyzed with Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for the clustered study design. RESULTS: Among 1507 participants (752 usual care; 755 intervention), the mean age was 61.9 years, and 77.6% were men. All participants except one completed 24 months of follow-up. Most participants (70%) had low educational attainment; 57.3% lived in rural areas; and ischemic heart disease was the predominant cause (77.4%). Baseline characteristics were comparable between the intervention and usual care groups. In the one-inflated β model, the probability of surviving up to 730 days without hospitalization was 79.4% (95% CI, 77.7%–81.2%) in the usual care group and 84.0% (95% CI, 82.2%–85.8%) in the intervention group. Participants in the intervention group had 78% higher odds of achieving a percent days alive and out of the hospital of exactly 1 (730/730 days) compared with those in the usual care group (odds ratio, 1.78 [95% CI, 1.42–2.23]). There were 201 deaths (26.73%) in the usual care group compared with 163 deaths (21.59%) in the intervention group (risk ratio, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.67–0.97]). In the multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, the intervention group had a 22% lower mortality risk than the usual care group (hazard ratio, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.63–0.95]; P =0.028). CONCLUSIONS: A nurse-coordinated, mobile health–supported collaborative care model for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in India increased the number of days alive and out of hospital, raised the absolute probability of remaining out of hospital by 4.5 percentage points, and reduced all-cause mortality by 22%. REGISTRATION: URL: www.ctri.nic.in ; Unique identifier: CTRI/2021/11/037797.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Effectiveness of Nurse-Coordinated, Digital-Supported Collaborative Care Model in Reducing Hospital Stay and Mortality Among Patients With Heart Failure: TIME-HF Cluster RCT India
Date Crossref
30/08/2026
Éditeur
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementMechanical Circulatory Support DevicesCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune donnée externe enregistrée en base. Sources et limites.