Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

“Is It Free?”: Out-of-Pocket Costs for Annual Checkups Among the Insured

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
3Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us, mm. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Preventive services are intended to be provided without cost-sharing under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), yet many patients still incur out-of-pocket (OOP) costs during routine annual checkups where such services are typically delivered. This study examines the prevalence and predictors of OOP payments among insured adults and assesses how both perceived affordability and awareness of ACA preventive care provisions relate to financial experiences and future preventive care intentions. Using original survey data from a statewide sample of 912 insured adults in Pennsylvania who had received an annual checkup within the past 10 years, we found that 23.5% of the sample reported OOP payments for care at their most recent checkup. OOP payments were more common among individuals who perceived healthcare as unaffordable, with an estimated 13 percentage points difference compared to those who viewed care as affordable (p < 0.001). They also paid higher average amounts when they did incur costs. Similarly, ACA policy awareness was also associated with OOP cost exposure. Respondents unaware of ACA protections were 12 percentage points more likely to pay OOP (p < 0.001). Insurance type was strongly associated with the likelihood of payment; compared to respondents with private insurance only, those with Medicaid only, Medicare only, or dual eligibility were significantly less likely to incur out-of-pocket costs. About 13.4% of respondents did not plan to receive or were unsure about receiving a checkup in the coming year. This group had slightly higher prior OOP costs than those planning to continue preventive visits, although the difference was not statistically significant. In a multivariable model, OOP payment experience was not significantly associated with future checkup intention. These findings highlight that even among insured adults, gaps in policy awareness and perceived affordability are associated with OOP costs that may be unexpected to patients. Improved communication about coverage protections and billing practices may help reduce financial barriers and strengthen trust in the healthcare system.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
“Is It Free?”: Out-of-Pocket Costs for Annual Checkups Among the Insured
Date Crossref
28/08/2026
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture pays non établi dans la notice
    Organisme public
  • University of Southern California Schaeffer Center for Health Policy & Economics pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Department of Public Health pays non établi dans la notice
    Organisme public
  • School of Business Administration pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • State College Penn State pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure

Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture, Schaeffer Center for Health Policy & Economics — University of Southern California et Department of Public Health, avec 2 autres affiliations.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Health Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionHealthcare Policy and ManagementPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.