Delay-Induced Hopf and Turing Instabilities in a Modified Brusselator Reaction-Diffusion Model
Résumé fourni par la source
A delayed reaction–diffusion extension of a restrained modified Brusselator model is studied under homogeneous Neumann boundary conditions. The delay is inserted into the restrained autocatalytic channel and is interpreted as an effective memory generated by intermediate-complex formation, catalytic activation, or residencetime transport. The analysis is developed locally near the positive equilibrium E ∗ = (1, 2); no global invariance of the nonnegative cone is claimed for the delayed inhibitor equation. After linearization, the modal characteristic equation reduces to a single-exponential form, which gives explicit formulas for homogeneous delay-induced Hopf-crossing thresholds and for linear stationary Turing thresholds. Their intersection is identified as a linear Turing–Hopf threshold rather than as a fully classified codimension-two nonlinear bifurcation. Numerical diagrams and direct simulations illustrate stable relaxation, stationary pattern onset, and mixed spatiotemporal modulation. A proportional feedback law is also examined. The activator feedback gain raises the stationary threshold, whereas the inhibitor feedback gain can lower part of that threshold; therefore positive feedback gains should not be interpreted as uniformly stabilizing the full reaction–diffusion system. The manuscript is thus framed as a corrected local threshold analysis and numerical exploration of delayed restrained Brusselator dynamics.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Delay-Induced Hopf and Turing Instabilities in a Modified Brusselator Reaction-Diffusion Model
- Date Crossref
- 26/08/2026
- Éditeur
- University Library in Kragujevac
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.