FBiosynthesis and analytics of specialized pro-resolving mediators: facts and faults
Résumé fourni par la source
Specialized pro-resolving mediators (SPMs) have been suggested to act as key factors that mediate the resolution of inflammation. With the availability of synthetic standards, pharmacological studies have garnered support for the hypothesis. However, assessment of the catalytic properties of lipoxygenases as well as investigations of the signalling of the proposed SPM receptors raise serious doubt that SPMs are endogenous mediators of the resolution of inflammation. In line with this, careful evaluation of published data on SPM detection revealed a lack of evidence for many reported SPMs in biological samples due to analytical LC-MS/MS methods that do not meet the quality standards of the scientific community, or they rely on ELISAs that lack selectivity and are not suited for the establishment of the presence of SPMs in complex biological samples. Furthermore, artefacts due to autoxidation of PUFAs can be misinterpreted as SPM formation. In this review, we critically assess the published reports on the biosynthesis and the analysis of SPMs and summarize the current status in the field.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- FBiosynthesis and analytics of specialized pro-resolving mediators: facts and faults
- Date Crossref
- 01/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.