Kidney Biopsy and Prognosis in Lupus Nephritis: Histological Predictors of Renal Outcome—A Narrative Review
Rattachement africain : it, nl. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The kidney biopsy is the cornerstone of prognostication in lupus nephritis, yet which features predict renal outcome—and which kind—remains incompletely defined. This narrative review relates eight histological axes to two families of renal outcome defined a priori: soft outcomes (renal flare/relapse and response/remission) and hard outcomes (doubling of serum creatinine, sustained decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate, and end-stage kidney disease; death is considered a competing, patient-level outcome). The axes span the ISN/RPS classification and its 2018 revision, individual glomerular and tubulointerstitial lesions, NIH activity and chronicity indices, lupus podocytopathy, lupus vasculopathy, antiphospholipid-antibody nephropathy, thrombotic microangiopathy and repeat biopsy. Across them, a consistent asymmetry emerges, although it is often not reproducible between studies. Chronicity—especially tubulointerstitial damage—predicts hard outcomes, whereas the activity index as a whole predicts response and flare. Cellular crescents and fibrinoid necrosis, active lesions that can signal hard outcomes, are the exceptions. Whether chronicity adds to baseline kidney function remains unsettled. Several prognostically important entities lie outside the proliferative classification; immune-deposit burden is largely diagnostic; and repeat histology adds information beyond the baseline biopsy. A recurring caveat is the therapeutic era, which modifies the very lesions scored.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Kidney Biopsy and Prognosis in Lupus Nephritis: Histological Predictors of Renal Outcome—A Narrative Review
- Date Crossref
- 28/08/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.