In-Cell Protein Crystallization via a Locally Flexible 24-mer Assembly Precursor
Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract In-cell protein crystallization (ICPC) produces ordered protein crystals within living cells, but the mechanisms used by proteins to acquire long-range crystalline order in the cellular environment remains poorly understood. Here, we define the assembly pathway of CipB, a crystalline inclusion protein from Photorhabdus luminescens . CipB crystals formed in cells dissolve under mild acidic conditions into a predominant 24-mer species, supporting a model in which an in-cell crystal is built from a discrete 24-mer assembly precursor rather than through direct packing of smaller oligomeric states. Structural analysis of recrystallized CipB shows that the same 24-mer architecture packs into a body-centered cubic lattice, consistent with the lattice observed for the in-cell crystals. Cryo-EM and molecular dynamics analyses indicate that the 24-mer assembly precursor preserves its overall architecture while retaining local conformational flexibility at the N-terminal and surface-loop regions. Mutation analyses further link the N-terminal region to the formation of the 24-mer precursor and surface residues to lattice assembly. These observations support a stepwise crystallization model in which N-terminal flexibility facilitates the formation of an assembly-competent 24-mer precursor, whereas defined hydrophobic surface contacts subsequently organize these precursors into a long-range-ordered lattice.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- In-Cell Protein Crystallization via a Locally Flexible 24-mer Assembly Precursor
- Date Crossref
- 28/08/2026
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.