Process‐Informed Multiscale Prediction of Nonlinear Compressive Behavior in Direct Compounded Compression Molded Short Fiber Composite Lattice Structures
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
ABSTRACT Direct compounded compression molding (DCCM) offers an efficient route for producing SFRTP lattice structures, but predicting their nonlinear compressive behavior is challenging due to spatially heterogeneous fiber orientations from the molding process. This study presents a process‐informed multiscale framework for such prediction. At the process scale, Moldflow simulation predicts fiber orientation tensors across lattice regions, validated by metallographic image analysis with a 7.89% relative error. At the material scale, a unit cell model with fiber‐matrix interfacial cohesive behavior captures the SFRTP's nonlinear response. A transversely isotropic elastoplastic surrogate model and orientation‐averaging method yield region‐specific constitutive properties. At the structural scale, these properties are assigned separately to struts and four joint types in a refined finite element model. The predicted maximum stress error in the nonlinear stage is 3.8%, a significant improvement over the previous homogeneous assignment strategy, which had a 12.28% error. This framework efficiently incorporates process‐induced local anisotropy into structural analysis of compression‐molded short‐fiber composite lattices, reducing the need for exhaustive region‐by‐region mechanical characterization.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Process‐Informed Multiscale Prediction of Nonlinear Compressive Behavior in Direct Compounded Compression Molded Short Fiber Composite Lattice Structures
- Date Crossref
- 28/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.