Baseline Hematologic Reserve and Laboratory-Defined Leukopenia/Neutropenia During Vancomycin Therapy: A Real-World Risk-Stratification Cohort Study
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Laboratory-defined leukopenia/neutropenia may occur during vancomycin therapy, but mild threshold-crossing abnormalities do not necessarily establish definite drug-induced toxicity. OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate a risk-stratification strategy based on baseline hematologic reserve and vancomycin treatment duration. METHODS: /L during therapy or within 3 days after discontinuation. A 4-component baseline hematologic reserve score was constructed from WBC, ANC, monocyte count, and hemoglobin. RESULTS: < .001). The highest risk was observed in high-risk patients treated for >14 days, with an event rate of 75.0%. The baseline score model showed moderate performance (area under the curve [AUC] 0.697), whereas the extended model incorporating the score-defined risk group, treatment duration, and clinical covariates improved discrimination (AUC 0.786). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: A 4-component baseline hematologic reserve score combined with treatment duration may help identify patients who warrant closer complete blood count monitoring during vancomycin therapy. These findings should be interpreted as laboratory-event risk stratification rather than proof of definite vancomycin-induced toxicity or as a mandatory discontinuation threshold.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Baseline Hematologic Reserve and Laboratory-Defined Leukopenia/Neutropenia During Vancomycin Therapy: A Real-World Risk-Stratification Cohort Study
- Date Crossref
- 27/08/2026
- Éditeur
- SAGE Publications
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.