Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré2026peer-review

Comment on egusphere-2026-3918

0Citations signalées
51Institutions associées
18Pays d’affiliation

Résumé fourni par la source

Abstract. Oxidative potential (OP) of atmospheric particulate matter (PM) is a metric of increasing scientific interest because it potentially links chemical particle properties to particle health effects. OP has been recently introduced as a recommended monitoring metric in the European Air Quality Directive. However, inconsistent protocols in the existing literature make it difficult to compare results across studies. Following a 2023 inter-laboratory comparison that focused on PM OP measured using the dithiothreitol (DTT) assay, this paper presents the findings and lessons learnt from a second inter-laboratory study focused on the ascorbic acid assay (OP-AA). In this study, twenty-six laboratories worldwide quantified OP of four PM filter samples and of one chemical compound to evaluate the entire analytical chain, including the extraction step, using a simplified OP-AA protocol. While most laboratories produced repeatable internal results when applying the simplified protocol, significant discrepancies between participants highlight the need for each laboratory to carefully evaluate deviations from the simplified OP-AA protocol. Over half of the 26 participants achieved satisfactory results, suggesting that the protocol is suitable for large-scale implementation. Beyond assessing performance, this work investigates technical, analytical, and mathematical refinements to measurement protocols. Building on the first DTT assay study, this second inter-laboratory comparison represents a significant step toward harmonizing OP assays, and provides specific recommendations to ensure consistent future measurements, ready to be applied in the new air quality directive EU 2024/2881.

Institutions

Institut polytechnique de GrenobleCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'EnvironnementInstitut des Géosciences de l'EnvironnementInstitut de Recherche pour le DéveloppementUniversité Grenoble AlpesJoint Research CentreMRC Centre for Environment and HealthImperial College LondonÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneFoundation for Research and Technology HellasNational Observatory of AthensUniversity of CretePaul Scherrer InstituteRuđer Bošković InstituteUniversity of Nova GoricaNational Institute of ChemistryUniversity of MariborInstitute for Medical Research and Occupational HealthInstitute of Atmospheric Sciences and ClimateUniversity of SalentoInstitut National de Recherche et de SécuritéLeibniz Institute for Tropospheric ResearchUniversité du littoral côte d'opaleUniversity of AlbertaHong Kong University of Science and TechnologyUniversity of Castilla-La ManchaUniversidad de AlcaláNetherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific ResearchHelmholtz MunichOccupational Cancer Research CentreUniversitat de Miguel Hernández d'ElxCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Analytical ChemistryTrent UniversityCenter for InnovationUniversity of BaselStockholm UniversityBolin Centre for Climate ResearchUniversity of California, Los AngelesDeakin UniversityInstitut Mines-TélécomUniversité de LilleUniversity of Hong KongSouth China University of TechnologyUniversity of Illinois Urbana-ChampaignUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinki Institute for Information TechnologyInstitute of Environmental Assessment and Water ResearchUtrecht UniversityThe Edgbaston HospitalUniversity of Birmingham

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Métadonnées interrogées à la demande auprès de OpenAlex (CC0). Sources et limites.