An experimental study of resilience and its effect on simulated persistent postconcussion symptoms
Rattachement africain : au, si. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a significant public health concern. Several factors contribute to symptom persistence, including potentially modifiable psychological factors. This study focused on resilience as a predictor of simulated persistent postconcussion symptoms (PPCS). METHODS: Participants were randomly assigned to a mTBI vignette condition with (n = 96) or without resilience-activation (control, n = 95). PPCS was measured using the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire. The potential for a moderated relationship was explored using a measure of emotional distress (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). RESULTS: Resilience, as measured by the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, was successfully manipulated via the vignette (resilience activation > controls). Hierarchical linear regression (N = 191) demonstrated a significant negative association between group and PPCS, with resilience significantly accounting for 3.27% of unique variance in PPCS. The interaction between predictor variables did not significantly contribute to the overall variance in PPCS. CONCLUSIONS: Findings are consistent with prior correlational studies of resilience and PPCS, with the present study also isolating a specific role for resilience as distinct from emotional distress. Psychological resilience appears to be a promising target for PPCS reduction.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- An experimental study of resilience and its effect on simulated persistent postconcussion symptoms
- Date Crossref
- 28/08/2026
- Éditeur
- CSIRO Publishing
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.