Out-of-pocket expenditure and catastrophic health expenditure in patients of leprosy at a tertiary care center in India
Rattachement africain : in. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVES: Leprosy continues to impose a significant clinical and socioeconomic burden. Despite free multidrug therapy, patients incur substantial out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE), leading to catastrophic health expenditure (CHE). Evidence on the economic burden of leprosy in India remains limited. METHODS: A pilot prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care center in North India, enrolling 56 patients with leprosy. Data on sociodemographic characteristics, direct and indirect healthcare costs, and income were collected. RESULTS: The study population had a median age of 30 years, with 73% males, and 68% from rural areas. Multibacillary disease predominated (93%), with complications in 73.2% and a median diagnostic delay of 24 months. Median monthly household income was Indian Rupees (₹)12 000, while median OOPE was ₹1625, largely driven by medicines and travel. CHE was observed in 55.4% of patients. OOPE was significantly higher in multibacillary cases compared with paucibacillary disease (P = .04). A considerable proportion of patients resorted to borrowing money, indicating financial distress. CONCLUSION: Leprosy imposes a substantial financial burden, with more than one-half of patients experiencing CHE. Strengthening early diagnosis, decentralizing care, and improving financial protection mechanisms are essential to mitigate economic hardship.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Out-of-pocket expenditure and catastrophic health expenditure in patients of leprosy at a tertiary care center in India
- Date Crossref
- 27/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.