Associations between maternal nutrition among women with hyperglycaemia in pregnancy and childhood anthropometry: The PANDORA cohort
Résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe the associations of nutrition during pregnancy with childhood anthropometry among First Nations and non-First Nations women with hyperglycaemia in pregnancy. METHODS: 224 women (58% First Nations women) with hyperglycaemia in pregnancy (168 gestational diabetes, 56 pre-existing type 2 diabetes) were administered food-frequency questionnaires during the third trimester. Childhood anthropometry body mass index, waist and arm circumferences and skinfold thickness) was measured at median (range) follow-up of 2.7 (1.5-5.0) years of age. Multivariable linear regression assessed associations of maternal nutrition with children's anthropometry after adjusting for age, sex, diabetes type, maternal body mass index, ethnicity, socioeconomic factors, birthweight, and breastfeeding. RESULTS: , p=0.03), waist circumference (ß-coefficient 2.2 cm, p<0.01), arm circumference (ß-coefficient 0.7 cm, p<0.01) and sum of skinfolds (ß-coefficient 4.0 mm, p<0.01) in children. There were no associations between consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages, fruit or vegetable intake and outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Addressing factors that support women and their families to maintain healthy diets is likely essential for improving childhood anthropometric outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH: System-level changes focusing on food environments are essential to shift dietary patterns during pregnancy.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Associations between maternal nutrition among women with hyperglycaemia in pregnancy and childhood anthropometry: The PANDORA cohort
- Date Crossref
- 01/10/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.